<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>RMM Online Advertising Blog &#187; search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.rmmonline.com/tag/search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.rmmonline.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 07:37:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>SEO Will Not Die in 2010</title>
		<link>http://blog.rmmonline.com/2010/01/seo-will-not-die-in-2010/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=seo-will-not-die-in-2010</link>
		<comments>http://blog.rmmonline.com/2010/01/seo-will-not-die-in-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 17:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.redmccombsmedia.com/?p=242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over the past couple of months there has been quite a bit of banter on the web about whether or not search engine optimization (SEO) will finally fall on its face in 2010. This has been a perennial argument for at least the past ten years, maybe longer. After all, Google keeps updating its algorithm [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the past couple of months there has been quite a bit of banter on the web about whether or not search engine optimization (SEO) will finally fall on its face in 2010. This has been a perennial argument for at least the past ten years, maybe longer. After all, Google keeps updating its algorithm to avoid being gamed, right? This has been further accelerated in recent months by the addition of <a href="http://www.google.com/support/websearch/bin/answer.py?hl=en&#038;answer=106230">Google Suggest</a>, <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/12/personalized-search-for-everyone.html">personalized search</a>, <a href="http://googlemobile.blogspot.com/2010/01/finding-places-near-me-now-is-easier.html">localized search</a>, <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/12/relevance-meets-real-time-web.html">real-time search</a> and finally, the search giant providing answers to questions within its own site (for example, <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=dallas+cowboys">sports scores</a>, <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=seattle+weather">weather</a>, <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=43202+movie+showtimes">movie showtimes</a>, and I&#8217;m sure there are others). If Google is changing things to make this more difficult, then what&#8217;s the value of this service?</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t be fooled. Yes, the snake oil hucksters that schlep keyword stuffing and link spamming are doomed, but their future was never very bright to begin with. If this is your strategy you&#8217;ll get nowhere, and if you&#8217;re paying for this then you&#8217;re wasting your money. If you&#8217;re charging someone for this, shame on you.</p>
<p>The core aspects of SEO, however, are needed more than ever. Google alone averages <a href="http://searchenginewatch.com/3630718">more than 200 million searches per day</a>. With that much daily traffic, their view of your website matters. Do you really want to completely ignore the potential to earn traffic from them? Or worse, leave it entirely to chance? If you get one ten-thousandth of one percent of that (that&#8217;s 0.0001%), 200 people per day will see your site. Do that many people cross your doorstep each day? Does your phone ring that many times each day? Clearly there is an upside to paying attention to Google.</p>
<p>The traffic that your website receives can provide keen insight into what your target market thinks about your company. Whatever the goals of your company, your website can help you get there. Increasing sales, improving customer retention, reaching a new customer base, improving the return that you get on your AdWords spend&#8230; these are all achievable. As long as you are measuring your website&#8217;s traffic and can recognize trends, you can reach your goals.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t misread the data. Yes search is changing, it has been since it started. It would be a mistake to infer that this makes SEO irrelevant. Quite the contrary, the changes that Google is making strengthen their search results, which gives people greater confidence in the answers they find through Google, which means that more people will be searching.</p>
<p>Optimizing your website for search is more important now than ever. Frankly, it&#8217;s irresponsible to think otherwise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.rmmonline.com/2010/01/seo-will-not-die-in-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Switch to Bing and get Paid</title>
		<link>http://blog.rmmonline.com/2009/06/switch-to-bing-and-get-paid/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=switch-to-bing-and-get-paid</link>
		<comments>http://blog.rmmonline.com/2009/06/switch-to-bing-and-get-paid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.redmccombsmedia.com/?p=97</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So my former cynicism regarding the launch of Bing has been tempered by my initial experiences with the search engine. I still haven’t switched my default search tool to Bing, but I am intrigued that Microsoft will &#8220;buy&#8221; my loyalty with Bing Cashback. I discovered this when doing a side-by-side comparison of Google &#038; Bing&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So my former cynicism regarding the launch of <a title="Bing" href="http://www.bing.com/">Bing</a> has been tempered by my initial experiences with the search engine. I still haven’t switched my default search tool to Bing, but I am intrigued that Microsoft will &#8220;buy&#8221; my loyalty with <a title="Bing shopping" href="http://www.bing.com/cashback/">Bing Cashback</a>. I discovered this when doing a side-by-side comparison of Google &#038; Bing&#8217;s shopping feature. I started my search on both sites for a digital camera, then selected a &#8220;Casio EXILIM CARD EX-S600&#8243; and searched on <a href="http://www.bing.com/search?q=Casio+EXILIM+CARD+EX-S600">both</a> <a href="http://www.google.com/#hl=en&#038;q=Casio+EXILIM+CARD+EX-S600">engines</a> for the product. I found the lowest price (reputable) seller on both sites to be TechforLess.com. The offered price was the same for both, except Bing will pay me 9% cashback (that’s over $20!).<br />
<span id="more-97"></span><br />
<div id="attachment_100" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 435px"><img src="http://blog.redmccombsmedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/bingcash.gif" alt="Bing cashback badge" title="bingcash" width="425" height="207" class="size-full wp-image-100" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Bing cashback badge</p></div></p>
<p>It works like a frequent shopper card &#038; you can collect your cashback from Bing 60 days after your purchase as long as you have more than $5 credit in your account. There is a maximum of $2,500 per year you can collect. There are a bunch of T&#8217;s &#038; C&#8217;s on their website, but basically you need to allow cookies in your browser settings &#038; perform the Bing search &#038; make the purchase within the same window &#038; user session. Of course, you can always search again to start over &#038; ensure you get credit.</p>
<p>$20 cashback! Bing, you have my attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.rmmonline.com/2009/06/switch-to-bing-and-get-paid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bing Launches &#8211; Yawn</title>
		<link>http://blog.rmmonline.com/2009/06/bing-launches-yawn/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=bing-launches-yawn</link>
		<comments>http://blog.rmmonline.com/2009/06/bing-launches-yawn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 20:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.redmccombsmedia.com/?p=92</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yet another &#8220;new&#8221; search engine, Bing.com, was released yesterday this time by Microsoft. This is another in a string of new search engines that are supposed to revolutionize the way we search, so far, I have been underwhelmed. Upon their launch, AskJeeves.com, Ask.com and now Bing.com all promised to provide internet users with a superior [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yet another &#8220;new&#8221; search engine, <a href="http://www.bing.com/">Bing.com</a>, was released yesterday this time by Microsoft. This is another in a string of new search engines that are supposed to revolutionize the way we search, so far, I have been underwhelmed. Upon their launch, AskJeeves.com, Ask.com and now Bing.com all promised to provide internet users with a superior search experience as compared to their current search engine. Microsoft is claiming that people frequently don’t get what they want on the first try, and that Bing will solve this problem. However, I reject the notion that people are dissatisfied with search, they may not find what they want immediately, but the productivity gains &#038; information accessibility improvements are so great, that most of us don’t even notice.</p>
<p>What’s the first step to solving a problem? Admitting there is a problem, but we are not there yet. Maybe Microsoft’s reported $100 million budget will address that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.rmmonline.com/2009/06/bing-launches-yawn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>5 SEO Success Stories</title>
		<link>http://blog.rmmonline.com/2009/06/5-seo-success-stories/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=5-seo-success-stories</link>
		<comments>http://blog.rmmonline.com/2009/06/5-seo-success-stories/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 21:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[success stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.redmccombsmedia.com/?p=60</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last month I wrote about a handful of social media successes. That post prompted some conversations around the water cooler, and a few people asked for something similar for search engine optimization. SEO is one of my favorite topics, so who am I to say no to this request? I&#8217;ve scoured the web, and here&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last month I wrote about a handful of social media successes. That post prompted some conversations around the water cooler, and a few people asked for something similar for <a href="http://www.redmccombsmedia.com/online-solutions/search-services">search engine optimization</a>. SEO is one of my favorite topics, so who am I to say no to this request? I&#8217;ve scoured the web, and here&#8217;s what I&#8217;ve come up with.<br />
<span id="more-60"></span></p>
<ol>
<li><a title="Free Online Dating Site" href="http://mingle2.com/">Mingle2</a> &#8211; In 2007 <a href="http://0at.org/">Matthew Inman</a> (the former CTO of <a href="http://www.seomoz.org/">SEOmoz</a>), designed and built the dating site Mingle2. Because of his previous experience with search engine optimization he knew the importance of inbound links, and he had the skills to boost his fledgling site through the likes of Google and Yahoo!. Within four months he generated nearly a quarter of a million links to the site and ranked #1 on Google for the phrases &#8220;online dating&#8221; and &#8220;free online dating.&#8221; This success earned him mentions on popular sites such as Digg and MSNBC.com, and generated nearly 2 million pageviews per month. Inman eventually sold the website to, and now works for JustSayHi. However cool Mingle2 is, it would have never succeeded this quickly (and in such a competitive market it may not have succeeded at all) apart from Inman&#8217;s skill in generating traffic through search engine optimization. The full story can be found on <a href="http://0at.org/pages/about">0at.org</a>.</li>
<li><a title="San Diego Chiropractor" href="http://www.bodyabcs.com/">San Diego Chiropractic</a> &#8211; David Klein is the owner of a San Diego chiropractic firm, and when he saw the potential within Google he decided to try to rank for the term &#8220;san diego chiropractor.&#8221; He attended a couple of PubCon&#8217;s and learned some techniques for ranking well for search terms. He then got to work, transcribing the video of a Matt Cutts talk, and generating clever cartoons of some of the people he ran into at the event. These efforts have earned him more than 3,000 one way links and he has achieved his goal. More than two years later he&#8217;s still above competitors that have that search phrase in their domain! Matt Cutts was so impressed that he even blogged about Dr Klein&#8217;s <a href="http://www.dullest.com/blog/whitehat-seo-tips-for-bloggers/">success</a>.</li>
<li><a title="Houston Repo" href="http://www.houstonrepo.com/">Automobile Recovery Bureau, Inc</a> &#8211; This is a Houston auto repossession company that has been in business for more than 60 years and was looking for a boost in business. They contracted an SEO firm which helped them decide on a new domain, update their content and generated links to the site. The plan worked, within a year they ranked #1 for terms such as &#8220;houston repo&#8221; and &#8220;houston repossession.&#8221; They must have been pleased with the results because their SEO efforts began in 2002, and over the years they have done the work to maintain a #1 ranking for the targeted terms.</li>
<li><a title="Portable Storage Containers" href="http://www.falconstorage.com/">Falcon Storage</a> &#8211; This is a Red McCombs Media client that leases storage containers in central Texas. In the summer of 2007 they launched a new website that generates quotes, has detailed information about their products, and the businesses which they serve. Six months later they expressed a desire for SEO, so we got to work keyword optimizing their site. Within two weeks they ranked #1 for such terms as &#8220;austin connex box&#8221; and &#8220;san antonio storage container.&#8221; The number of quotes generated by their website skyrocketed. Since then they&#8217;ve launched a blog, which has helped to solidify their strength in this market.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.southwest.com/">Southwest Airlines</a> &#8211; Once again I have to include Southwest. I&#8217;m not a fanboy, but I do think that they get modern marketing at a level that eludes many other companies, and this is a great story. Southwest&#8217;s social marketing manager, <a href="http://twitter.com/paulaberg">Paula Berg</a>, shared this last week at the <a href="http://www.onlinemarketingsummit.com/cities_and_agendas/austin.php">Austin Online Marketing Summit</a>. Every year the folks at Southwest&#8217;s headquarters, including the CEO, celebrate Halloween with a crazy costume. One year the CEO mentioned that he planned to dress as Gene Simmons. Someone commented that the CEO of USAir had donned that costume a few years ago, and after discussing it for a while they went to Google to prove it. They tried searches such as &#8220;doug parker gene simmons,&#8221; &#8220;usair halloween,&#8221; &#8220;doug parker costume&#8221; and anything else they could think of to find the answer. For every search term they tried, <a href="http://www.blogsouthwest.com/">Nuts About Southwest</a> was the top hit. They had blogged about halloween so much that their site was the top hit for terms directly about their competitor. Talk about success!</li>
</ol>
<p>These are just five stories from a broad segment of businesses. There bottom line is that SEO works, and savvy companies across America are taking advantage of Google&#8217;s strength by working to appear for competitive search terms. Don&#8217;t be left out. If you think your company could benefit from search engine optimization, please contact us and we&#8217;ll discuss the possibilities with you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.rmmonline.com/2009/06/5-seo-success-stories/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Local Companies Succeeding in Search</title>
		<link>http://blog.rmmonline.com/2009/05/local-companies-succeeding-in-search/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=local-companies-succeeding-in-search</link>
		<comments>http://blog.rmmonline.com/2009/05/local-companies-succeeding-in-search/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 22:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ppc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.redmccombsmedia.com/?p=16</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently spoke with Victor Lund of the WAV Group regarding the various techniques &#38; strategies we have used to successfully grow small to medium sized business using local search. We have had great success with both paid search through Google pay-per-click and organic search through search engine optimization. The article is focused on the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently spoke with Victor Lund of the <a title="WAV Group" href="http://www.wavgroup.com/">WAV Group</a> regarding the various techniques &amp; strategies we have used to successfully grow small to medium sized business using local search. We have had great success with both paid search through Google pay-per-click and organic search through search engine optimization. The article is focused on the real estate industry, in which we have done well, but the trends apply to the broader market as well.</p>
<p>Check it out, <a title="WAV Group Releases Localism White Paper" href="http://waves.wavgroup.com/wav-group-releases-localism-whitepaper">WAV Group Releases Localism Whitepaper</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.rmmonline.com/2009/05/local-companies-succeeding-in-search/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

