<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>RMM Online Advertising Blog &#187; commentary</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.rmmonline.com/category/commentary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.rmmonline.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 07:37:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Predictions for 2011, Sort Of</title>
		<link>http://blog.rmmonline.com/2010/12/predictions-for-2011-sort-of/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=predictions-for-2011-sort-of</link>
		<comments>http://blog.rmmonline.com/2010/12/predictions-for-2011-sort-of/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 17:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rmmonline.com/?p=396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What a great year! 2010 brought a lot of changes for @RMM_Online and for me personally #newjob. After reading 1,864,923 blogs entitled, &#8220;Predictions for 2011&#8243; #lame, you&#8217;re probably thinking, no, not another one. I think there is a law that everyone in the advertising world has to make a list of predictions just so people [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a great year! 2010 brought a lot of changes for @RMM_Online and for me personally <a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23newjob">#newjob</a>. After reading 1,864,923 blogs entitled, &#8220;Predictions for 2011&#8243; <a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23lame">#lame</a>, you&#8217;re probably thinking, no, not another one. I think there is a law that everyone in the advertising world has to make a list of predictions just so people think we are paying attention. Anyway, here it is, I beg you to read it, and how about following me on Twitter (I need these guys at RMM and Lin to think I&#8217;m more important than I really am) @airrailey <a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23Thanks">#Thanks</a>&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8217;11 points of #nonsense for the new year</p>
<ol>
<li>2011 is the year of Mobile. Wait, I thought that was supposed to be 2010, or was it 2009? No, certainly it was 2008; must have been 2007, the year of the first iPhone. <a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23confused">#confused</a></li>
<li>Social Media begins to dominate customer service. As in-store customer service continues to decline, Social Media customer service will allow brands friendly, efficient ways to assist the customer without the long wait of an 800 number or the inconvenience of driving to the store. More brands will adapt the &#8220;Comcast model&#8221; and allow followers to see complaints by others, because the real story is how the brand solves it. Ok, this is a true story: I recently called customer service for a major computer manufacturer and was greeted by a guy with an accent like Apu from the Simpsons, who started off by saying, &#8220;Thank you for calling ____, this is Peter Parker, how can I help you?&#8221; I starting laughing so hard I forgot what I was calling about. <a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23spiderman">#spiderman</a></li>
<li><a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23Hashtags">#Hashtags</a> will become part of everyday writing. People will use #hashtags to emphasize subjects, thoughts and events, even in offline writing. In a completely unrelated story, @BillClinton will declare &#8220;<a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23hashtag">#hashtag</a>&#8221; the greatest word ever. <a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23stonedpimpxprez">#stonedpimpxprez</a></li>
<li>Those willing to push the limits of creative and technology will be rewarded. Those who are doing the same thing they&#8217;ve been doing since 2009 will disappear. You know who you are! <a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23buhbye">#buhbye</a></li>
<li>Honolulu will concede the Obama Library to Chicago in order to pursue a Dog the Bounty Hunter Library. <a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23randyjacksonlikesyourname">#randyjacksonlikesyourname</a></li>
<li>Apple will release the iControlU, a chip that is implanted in the brain allowing users to instantly listen to any song or watch any video with a simple press of the temple. Unfortunately, reception issues will force users to wrap their head with oversized rubberbands. VGA output also proves to be rather tricky. <a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23jobsarmy">#jobsarmy</a></li>
<li>Somewhere, some teen-aged boy will be beaten to a pulp by an angry middle-aged man for using the words #epicfail. With any luck, it will be Justin Beiber. <a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23ohpleaseibegyou">#ohpleaseibegyou</a></li>
<li>Speaking of luck (this is more of a wish than a prediction), any chance Andrew Luck falls to <a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23Jacksonville">#Jacksonville</a> in the April draft? Here&#8217;s the prediction part: If David Garrard or Jack Del Rio are part of the Jaguars organization come September, the Jags will lose at least one fan. <a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23falconsbandwagon">#falconsbandwagon</a></li>
<li>And speaking of <a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23epicfail">#epicfail</a>, @SethMacFarlane, (in Lois’ voice) Really? I had to watch Journey to the North Pole again just to get the bad taste out of my mouth from It’s a Trap. But, the failures are few and far between which is what makes <a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23FamilyGuy">#FamilyGuy</a> the best show on TV. No real prediction here, just upset over the wasted $2.99 iTunes download. <a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23bringClevelandbacktoQuahog">#bringClevelandbacktoQuahog</a></li>
<li>Online shoppers will become full of Gilt&#8230; and Ideeli&#8230; and HauteLook&#8230; and Rue La La. Brands and retailers will further monetize the trend with brand-specific &#8220;private&#8221; flash sales within their own sites. I would say my wife is addicted to flash sales, but the truth is, I have the Gilt Groupe, HauteLook and Rue La La apps on my iPad. <a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23guiltypleasure">#guiltypleasure</a></li>
<li>A whole bunch of exciting announcements will come from @RMM_Online. Follow us on @Twitter and @LinkedIn to learn more <a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23video">#video</a> <a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23backenddata">#backenddata</a> <a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23newwebsite">#newwebsite</a><a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23growingteam"> #growingteam</a> <a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23bonusesforbloggers">#bonusesforbloggers</a></li>
</ol>
<p>Everyone at RMM wishes you a happy and healthy 2011!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.rmmonline.com/2010/12/predictions-for-2011-sort-of/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Selling Solutions</title>
		<link>http://blog.rmmonline.com/2010/10/selling-solutions/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=selling-solutions</link>
		<comments>http://blog.rmmonline.com/2010/10/selling-solutions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 18:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[display]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.redmccombsmedia.com/?p=382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was recently at a resort bar and wanted one of those &#8220;frou-frou&#8221; drinks with an umbrella; you know &#8211; the kind you would never drink around your buddies, but can&#8217;t wait to order while on vacation. The drink I ordered was made with a particular brand of vodka, but I wanted it to be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was recently at a resort bar and wanted one of those &#8220;frou-frou&#8221; drinks with an umbrella; you know &#8211; the kind you would never drink around your buddies, but can&#8217;t wait to order while on vacation. The drink I ordered was made with a particular brand of vodka, but I wanted it to be made with a different brand of vodka, and was immediately and emphatically told, &#8220;No,&#8221; by the bartender, &#8220;we can&#8217;t substitute.&#8221; At first, I thought he was joking, but after a few exchanges, I moved down the bar and got the drink the way I wanted it from a much nicer, customer service-oriented bartender. She got a nice tip.</p>
<p>As I was walking back to the table, I started thinking about how this is a lot like the online sales process: so many reps from all forms of online media trying to sell the inventory they have, but not necessarily the inventory that&#8217;s best for the client&#8217;s initiative. Not everything can be in black and white, and we need to be able to propose solutions that are in shades of gray. It&#8217;s our job as digital reps, especially multi-platform digital reps, to do more than sell. In many cases, we become the agency&#8217;s strategic partner. We know our solutions capabilities better than anyone and it&#8217;s our job deliver a well-conceived plan that can be justified through research and case studies. If it&#8217;s better shaken, why are so many reps pushing it stirred?</p>
<p>In a recent Media Post article, <a href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=136310">Woe The Digital Sale: Do You Know What You&#8217;re Selling?</a>, Amy Auerbach wrote, &#8220;Agency buyers&#8217; priorities are around client service, doing a good day&#8217;s work that ends earlier than 9 p.m., and having a life. Salespeople actually can contribute to all of those things&#8230; Help buyers manage their time by delivering RFP responses that are on-point and flawless. Over-communicate and provide extra research and rationale when you make recommendations.&#8221;  As digital reps, it is important to serve as an extension of the client&#8217;s team, and to not only create a partnership, but to be the &#8220;go-to&#8221; rep for ALL of their digital needs.</p>
<p>In today&#8217;s nearly over-saturated marketplace, buyers tend to stay with what they know works and people they trust. While building these relationships can take months, even years, losing them can be instant. One of the fastest ways to fall off of an RFP list or lose your preferred vendor status is to give the planner the &#8220;same ole, same ole&#8221; with each proposal. To be a successful AE, one must be part Brand Manager, part Media Planner and part Research Analyst. Those who can best embrace these roles will ultimately win the IO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.rmmonline.com/2010/10/selling-solutions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Watch This Space</title>
		<link>http://blog.rmmonline.com/2010/09/watch-this-space/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=watch-this-space</link>
		<comments>http://blog.rmmonline.com/2010/09/watch-this-space/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 17:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[display]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.redmccombsmedia.com/?p=368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I noticed an interesting banner last week and followed it back to this site: http://www.google.com/adwords/watchthisspace. It is an extremely interesting and compelling presentation about Google&#8217;s fresh attempt to position itself as a one-stop shop for online display advertising. We know that they have been making inroads in all sorts of areas (Google Display Network, Google Ad [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed an interesting banner last week and followed it back to this site: <a href="http://www.google.com/adwords/watchthisspace">http://www.google.com/adwords/watchthisspace</a>.</p>
<p>It is an extremely interesting and compelling presentation about Google&#8217;s fresh attempt to position itself as a one-stop shop for online display advertising. We know that they have been making inroads in all sorts of areas (<a href="http://www.google.com/adwords/displaynetwork/">Google Display Network</a>, <a href="http://www.google.com/doubleclick/advertisers/ad_exchange.html">Google Ad Exchange</a>, etc.) for some time, but this is the first time I have seen it packaged up so nicely and squarely targeted at advertisers, ad agencies, etc. Google does have the muscle to resolve a lot of the issues that plague our industry through integrating all of their solutions and makes a compelling case for using their platform.</p>
<p>What does this mean for all the rest of us? I think that remains to be seen, but it is clear that Google sees value in aggressively pursuing the dollars that are currently running through other ad networks. If they can do for display what they did for SEM by making it ultra-turnkey to flight display campaigns, it could change the way people are buying display advertising, even at the biggest shops.</p>
<p>That said, what Google has in technology, it lacks in customer service. We know this from the stories we hear from many of our clients. It is their ubiquity that makes it hard to provide a customer experience (not computer user experience) that many businesses and agencies need. Their hands are in almost every pot. Even some of their technologies acquisitions have been orphaned to focus on others (Doubleclick being the most relevant example here).</p>
<p>The other thing that Google doesn&#8217;t do is create brilliant advertising concepts. It&#8217;s one thing to own the network and develop tools to analyze success of online marketing campaigns from a metric perspective, but coming up with the idea that will affect consumers&#8217; buying decisions is another. Admittedly that&#8217;s not Google&#8217;s business, but in the rapidly changing advertising marketplace, technological innovation is often confused with marketing insight. Good ad units, networks, and metrics do not a great marketing campaign make. They are simply the vehicles for the ideas that will turn heads and open pocketbooks.  What makes advertising work is the compelling, inspiring, revolutionary presentation of ideas that inform the way people see their own needs/wants/desires. This has nothing to do with technology. It has to do with creativity.</p>
<p>When they finally make their move as it seems they are now (look at the <a href="http://adage.com/archive-date?pub=32&amp;vol=81">cover of Advertising Age</a>), Google moves with such force that it seems like the entire playbook is being rewritten. We all know that it isn&#8217;t, but when a giant moves the ground definitely shakes. The best thing about giants for all of us little guys is that they can&#8217;t move or turn fast. That leaves lots of room for us to operate as the David to their Goliath (and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goliath#The_story">we know who won that battle</a>). We had best be ready to do what only we can do and do it better: serve our customers with excellence and help them cultivate the genius ideas that will help their businesses engage the marketplace. We can&#8217;t confuse what we do best with what the Googles of the world do best.</p>
<p>Then again, this could all just be a bunch of amazing advertising on Google&#8217;s part&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.rmmonline.com/2010/09/watch-this-space/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Process Refinement</title>
		<link>http://blog.rmmonline.com/2010/09/process-refinement/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=process-refinement</link>
		<comments>http://blog.rmmonline.com/2010/09/process-refinement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 16:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[products]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.redmccombsmedia.com/?p=362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A wise man recently told me that &#8220;99% of problems are process problems&#8221;. While the hyperbole is evident, the point is not. Most organizational problems are not a result of bad people or products, but of bad process. This includes both macro-level procedures that we define to deliver our unique advertising solutions, and micro-level individual [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A wise man recently told me that &#8220;99% of problems are process problems&#8221;. While the hyperbole is evident, the point is not. Most organizational problems are not a result of bad people or products, but of bad process. This includes both macro-level procedures that we define to deliver our unique advertising solutions, and micro-level individual communication and issue resolution techniques.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve grown RMM from a five person shop in 2005 to a national company with fifty-seven employees in six states. I thought it would be valuable to share some of the keys that have propelled our growth over this time.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re big believers in process definition &amp; continuous improvement. We&#8217;ve gone through almost everything we do as a company and have defined the process to ensure that we offer consistently high levels of customer service, including minimizing &#8220;dropped balls&#8221;. By clearly defining our procedures, everyone involved knows exactly what to expect from each other &amp; we find that we can offer consistent excellence in running campaigns for customers. Defining procedures also helps us identify inefficiencies and continuously make changes to ensure maximum effectiveness. This has become critical as we run hundreds of client campaigns per month, and our growth is a testament to our teams&#8217; ability to deliver excellence consistently.</p>
<p>Another key component of our process definition is employing the KISS principle.  I don&#8217;t mean dressing up like Gene Simmon’s band, but the adage &#8220;Keep It Simple, Stupid&#8221;. Online advertising involves lots of complexity; each of our <a href="http://www.redmccombsmedia.com/online-solutions">display campaigns</a> has over twenty steps from initiation to fulfillment across six different teams. There is a significant amount of work that goes into defining &amp; refining procedures, but the bulk of the work really comes from keeping it simple: defining the mechanisms to simply handle the majority of cases, while allowing the flexibility or having exceptions for the edge cases. The hard work is to simplify a complex process.</p>
<p>We love automation. We use it not for the purpose of abstracting human contact &amp; intelligence, but for mechanizing rote or routine tasks so our talented team members can focus their efforts on what they do best! We have found that investing in automation results in happier team members who are more productive and can offer more creative, &#8220;solution-oriented&#8221; responses to our advertising clients.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d love to hear more thoughts &amp; ideas on how others are finding results by focusing on improving operations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.rmmonline.com/2010/09/process-refinement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TV and Online Convergence</title>
		<link>http://blog.rmmonline.com/2010/09/tv-and-online-convergence/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=tv-and-online-convergence</link>
		<comments>http://blog.rmmonline.com/2010/09/tv-and-online-convergence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 21:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comScore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fred Figglehorn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hulu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nickelodeon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.redmccombsmedia.com/?p=354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is no doubt to experienced media professionals that the two most powerful forms of media in the modern world are TV and internet.  Over the last 3 years we have seen these two mediums come together like never before.  The  E-volution is incredibly dynamic and will eventually revolutionize media, again. According to Nielsen’s Broadcast [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no doubt to experienced media professionals that the two most powerful forms of media in the modern world are TV and internet.  Over the last 3 years we have seen these two mediums come together like never before.  The  E-volution is incredibly dynamic and will eventually revolutionize media, again.</p>
<p>According to <a title="Nielsen's Broadcast Season Universe" href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/1149-million-us-television-homes-estimated-for-2009-2010-season/">Nielsen’s Broadcast Season Universe Estimates</a>, the number of television households in the US has grown from 111.4 million in 2007 to an estimated of $114.9 million by the end of 2010. The fact is that more people watching television than ever before.</p>
<p>Of course the growth of online video views has been explosive. According to <a title="July data from comScore" href="http://www.comscore.com/Press_Events/Press_Releases/2010/8/comScore_Releases_July_2010_U.S._Online_Video_Rankings">July data from comScore</a>, 178 million U.S. Internet users viewed online video content during the month and averaged 14.7 hours per viewer.</p>
<p>Content is still king when it comes to this convergence. The biggest difference is that much of what is being viewed is user generated content. YouTube has millions of channels, some with high production quality and with very low production quality. The millions of views generated by low budget content may surprise some. The one channel that comes to mind is <a title="Fred" href="http://www.youtube.com/user/Fred">Fred</a> (aka <a title="Fred Figglehorn" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Figglehorn">Fred Figglehorn</a>). This kid has been on YouTube for years. He gets millions of views for every video that he puts out and monetizes these views through the <a title="YouTube Partnership Program" href="http://www.youtube.com/partners">YouTube partnership program</a>. I believe he&#8217;s now making a movie for Nickelodeon. We have already seen TV show start to increase distribution of content through sites like Hulu. You will start to a significant increase in web based user generated content being formatted and produced for TV.  Fred’s TV movie and shows TV shows like Web soup are just the beginning.</p>
<p>From a business perspective it just makes sense. If your self produced show/videos generate million of views online while drawing a certain demographic, then the TV folks already have an audience.</p>
<p>One of the advantages that web video has over TV is all of the real time metrics/interaction that can be tracked with advertisements.  There are several companies that are developing the same type of tracking capabilities for TV.</p>
<p>I’ m writing this blog entry while looking at my 32inch Apple monitor. I still prefer my 42 inch plasma for TV.  The biggest part of this E-volution will be when I’m writing my blog entry on the same screen that I watch the NFL.  In other words when TV/web surfers start using the same monitor for both that will be the biggest difference.</p>
<p>If you have any doubts about this convergence just think back the 1990&#8242;s. Remember dial up? Remember trying to watch a video using dial up? The very fastest modem at that time was 56kb. You often would have to wait at 20 to 30 minutes for a video to download. Things have changed at a rapid pace and unless of course the Mayan Calendar is correct, I have no doubt this convergence will happen in a big way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.rmmonline.com/2010/09/tv-and-online-convergence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook Won&#8217;t Kill Search</title>
		<link>http://blog.rmmonline.com/2010/07/facebook-wont-kill-search/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=facebook-wont-kill-search</link>
		<comments>http://blog.rmmonline.com/2010/07/facebook-wont-kill-search/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 23:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.redmccombsmedia.com/?p=332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday Facebook announced that they now have 500 million active users.  That&#8217;s pretty impressive for a company that started in 2004 as an exclusive network only open to certain schools. Facebook has come a long way though; it certainly isn&#8217;t the same Facebook I fell hard for in my freshman dorm at University of Arkansas. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday <a href="http://www.facebook.com/">Facebook</a> announced that they now have <a href="http://blog.facebook.com/blog.php?post=409753352130">500 million active users</a>.  That&#8217;s pretty impressive for a company that started in 2004 as an exclusive network only open to certain schools. Facebook has come a long way though; it certainly isn&#8217;t the same Facebook I fell hard for in my freshman dorm at <a href="http://www.uark.edu/">University of Arkansas</a>. But what do 500 million users mean for Facebook &#8211; besides revenue and influence? Many people are speculating that this could change the future of Search. I personally don&#8217;t see that happening. Here&#8217;s why.</p>
<p>This week marked another interesting milestone for Facebook. For the first time, they were included in the <a href="http://mashable.com/2010/07/20/facebook-survey/">2010 American Customer Survey Index E-Business Report</a>. Facebook scored 64 out of 100. The reasons for this score, according to ForeSee Results CEO Larry Freed, are &#8220;privacy concerns, frequent changes to the website, and commercialization and advertising.&#8221;  To be fair to Facebook, I think that a lot of these concerns are unwarranted. Facebook is a business, so commercialization and advertising are inevitable. As Facebook grows, so are changes to the website. Truthfully, today&#8217;s Facebook is a much better format than it was in 2004, especially considering how much more content is on each profile, though every change to the user interface rallies thousands of users rejecting the changes.  I think the problem most people have boils down to the fact that Facebook today isn&#8217;t Facebook circa 2004, and for a lot of people, not the Facebook they signed up for initially.</p>
<p>When I signed up, I was able to post anything I wanted for my friends old and new to see, but most importantly, I could do so (seemingly) without consequence. Great hook for college kids, right? Then, employers started checking Facebook profiles: strike 1. Facebook later became open to high school students: BIG strike two, and in my opinion, the first time Facebook did something &#8220;uncool&#8221;. Eventually, Facebook became open to anybody and everybody, including mothers and grandmothers everywhere: strike 3; I&#8217;m out. But not really &#8211; I can&#8217;t leave Facebook. Professionally and socially, Facebook provides a service I can&#8217;t find anywhere else online, so I&#8217;m stuck with a measly profile and a handful of appropriate pictures.  Facebook has become a chore, not enjoyment.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll admit that I&#8217;m skeptical of Facebook&#8217;s third-party applications (and privacy settings and open graph and Facebook for websites and&#8230;), so I&#8217;m not getting the full Facebook experience. But like I said earlier, that&#8217;s not the Facebook I signed up for. A lot of my peers share this sentiment and that score of 64 shows that it&#8217;s likely more than just my peers.  But, since there isn&#8217;t an alternative, we stay, unhappily, on Facebook. Scott Stratten of UnMarketing just wrote a great post about <a href="http://www.un-marketing.com/blog/2010/07/21/why-i-changed-my-coffee-religion/">customer loyalty</a> and how a company shouldn&#8217;t ignore loyal customers. Facebook has 500 million (unwillingly) loyal customers.  I think if a worthy alternative pops up on the web (here&#8217;s looking at you, <a href="http://www.joindiaspora.com/">Diaspora</a>), Facebook would see how disloyal its users are when a mass exodus occurs. They can ask <a href="http://www.myspace.com/">MySpace</a> about that. Remember MySpace? They were a big deal in 2004&#8230;</p>
<p>Satisfaction isn&#8217;t low all over the web though. <a href="http://www.google.com/">Google</a>, <a href="http://www.bing.com/">Bing</a>, and <a href="http://www.yahoo.com/">Yahoo</a> received 80, 77 and 76 respectively in ForeSee Results survey. I think this shows customers still trust search. To most people, search hasn&#8217;t changed that drastically. From a <a href="http://www.redmccombsmedia.com/online-solutions/search-services">search marketing</a> perspective I can attest that search changes daily, sometimes so fast I work with my running shoes on. People love social media &#8211; I know I sure do – and it can offer a whole lot, but, at the end of the day, Search is an institution. There&#8217;s been great competition that has truly benefited users as search results are more fine-tuned for location, search history, etc. It will be a long time before Social Media can give me better, unbiased results for an inquiry than Search, and with Facebook&#8217;s current customer satisfaction, I don’t think they&#8217;ll be the powerhouse to take down Search.</p>
<p>Do you think Facebook will change the future of Search? Sound off in comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.rmmonline.com/2010/07/facebook-wont-kill-search/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Online Advertising is changing the Film Industry</title>
		<link>http://blog.rmmonline.com/2010/04/how-online-advertising-is-changing-the-film-industry/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=how-online-advertising-is-changing-the-film-industry</link>
		<comments>http://blog.rmmonline.com/2010/04/how-online-advertising-is-changing-the-film-industry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 17:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[success stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.redmccombsmedia.com/?p=324</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Changing the film industry one click at a time. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What movie should I see tonight? Just ask the Internet!</p>
<p>So, your co-worker coaxes you to watch the trailer for <em>Twilight</em> when you came in for work this morning and it convinced you to be Team Edward all the way. Well, you’ll probably see the preview again in the theater a couple of times and wonder all along why you weren’t Team Jacob in the first place?  Regardless, you’ve seen the trailer twice as many times as you would’ve seen it ten years ago and you’ve invited all your friends to the midnight showing – now that’s how advertising works!</p>
<p>It’s almost impossible to go about your day online and not see an advertisement for an upcoming feature film.  The ad may be a banner across your e-mail server, or a pop up ad on your favorite news page.  It may even be free ticket dancing across your screen or a contest that entices you to check out the trailer.  What ever it is &#8211; online advertising for movies has become more and more aggressive since the first preview showed up on our laptops.</p>
<p>Take the movie <em>Paranormal Activity</em>.  This film was made for a dime in 2007 and sat on the shelves at Paramount for two years.  Needing to close out its fiscal year with a bang,  Paramount dusted off a copy and brought in the ad wizards.  With few dollars for marketing, a specific approach was taken: the movie would NOT carry a wide release unless 1 million votes were received on their official website, trailer included of course. And even though the indie hit was slowly making money already, the online approach to getting this film out and about was simply genius.  Once people heard about the scary flick on sites like Twitter who aggressively helped pushed the outcome by telling folks to “tweet the scream.&#8221;  People everywhere logged on to the site, watched the preview and made their choice.  When someone tells me I can’t watch a film – you better believe I will see it. And for online ad companies, this was a unique way to track what sites people were surfing, what advertisements linked them to the film’s website, how many people participated and how financially effective the campaign was. To date, <em>Paranormal Activity</em> has grossed $183 million worldwide so, you tell me.</p>
<p>Wikipedia claims that ten billion online videos including movie trailers are watched annually; while previews at movie theaters trail this number by thousands. Over 15 million people viewed the trailer for<em> Paranormal Activity</em> on<em> YouTube</em>, and that&#8217;s how online advertising has proved to be changing the film industry one click at a time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.rmmonline.com/2010/04/how-online-advertising-is-changing-the-film-industry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are you QRious?</title>
		<link>http://blog.rmmonline.com/2010/02/are-you-qrious/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=are-you-qrious</link>
		<comments>http://blog.rmmonline.com/2010/02/are-you-qrious/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 23:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ann Marie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[success stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[promotion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.redmccombsmedia.com/?p=262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The funny looking box you see above is a not new technology; however the QR Code is pretty foreign to us in the U.S. QR stands for Quick Response. In the next decade, I believe QR codes will start popping up in U.S. media providing our culture with what we love best; content delivery that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="http://blog.redmccombsmedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/RMM.jpg" alt="RMM QR Code" title="RMM" width="156" height="156" class="size-full wp-image-261" />
<p>The funny looking box you see above is a not new technology; however the QR Code is pretty foreign to us in the U.S. QR stands for Quick Response. In the next decade, I believe QR codes will start popping up in U.S. media providing our culture with what we love best; content delivery that is easy and FAST. </p>
<p>The QR Code is a kind of 2D barcode that contains a plethora of personalized digital data. It is primarily used to send links to your mobile device. A simple snapshot with your camera phone and the QR Code sends the necessary information to open your web browser to a specific URL site or text message. 2D barcodes allow advertisers and publishers to push relevant digital content directly to consumers? mobile phones when they are most interested in a product or service. This technology bypasses the search engine stage, allowing advertisers and publishers to give people more information at the moment of awareness.</p>
<p><strong>What are QR codes and what are they already doing?</strong><br />
Currently, QR codes are being used as a tool to get more information. You see a code in a magazine, snap a pic, and it directs you to the product site on your mobile phone. Japan and some European countries have taken this technology to a new level. They do use it for informational purposes; however it has opened the door to deeper consumer engagement and interactivity. QR codes are proving that they have the potential to do even more for advertisers and consumers alike. </p>
<p><strong>Some innovative ideas:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>URLs/Coupons</strong> &#8211; <a href="http://www.dickssportinggoods.com/">Dick&#8217;s Sporting Goods</a> announced its <a href="https://dsports.mobi/">new mobile site</a> with QR coding at the new Cowboys Stadium during the University of Oklahoma vs. Brigham Young University bowl game. This was the first marketing campaign to place a QR code on a jumbo-tron during a sporting event. University of Oklahoma vs. Brigham Young University fans were encouraged to take a picture of the QR code and were directed to a coupon for the store. If your phone didn&#8217;t have QR technology, no problem. The website URL and an email address were clearly displayed as other ways to acquire the coveted coupon. A deeper explanation of the campaign and the results can be <a href="http://brandingbrand.com/blog/dicks-uses-qr-code-marketing-on-cowboys-stadium-jumbotron/">found online</a>.</li>
<li><strong>E-tickets</strong> &#8211; Imagine not having to wait in line for your Austin City Limits Music Festival wristband a week before the show starts or the three hour line on the day of. QR codes can completely eliminate the need for wristbands and tickets. After purchasing your ticket online you receive a QR codes to your mobile phone. A simple scan of your phone will show that you have purchased a three-day or one-day only pass. Once you have checked in, your ticket is marked as used.  Also, imagine after you have checked in, your phone directs you to the ACL site, where you are able to view weather, time changes, band line-up, vendor maps, and more. QR codes could even eventually tell you exactly what song your favorite band is playing on what stage in real time. Most importantly, no lost ACL tickets and no need to be worried they won&#8217;t scan.</li>
<li><strong>Business cards &#038; Resumes</strong> &#8211; An awesome way to set you apart from the crowd. Why not include your LinkedIn QR code on your resume? Or your company&#8217;s website on your business cards?</li>
<li><strong>Tattoos</strong> &#8211; I would grab some temporary ones for the office party. Or, if you want to go permanent that&#8217;s cool too. Just make sure it&#8217;s something to last a lifetime!</li>
<li><strong>Billboards</strong> &#8211; Disney in Tokyo has <a href="http://eurotechnology.com/blog/labels/QR-code.html">Mickey Mouse QR codes</a> that send you to the Disneyland website. Billboards in subway stations allow for easy point and shoot.</li>
<li><strong>Branded QR codes</strong>- include a picture within the code and in color &#8211; These QR codes from <a href="http://www.beqrious.com/generator">BeQRious</a> can have color or pictures imbeded in the code! Why not include your face on that resume? Or, put your company logo inside the QR code on that business card?</li>
<li><strong>Swag and self-branding</strong> &#8211; Additional information is gained by using QR codes. Therefore, the potential use for them is limitless. The code can contain anything from your information, to your likes and dislikes, to what you like in a guy, to what your plans are for that night. Why not create a coffee mug, a hat, a <a href="http://blog.craftzine.com/archive/2009/03/craft_video_machineknitted_qr.html">scarf</a>, even a baby bib. You can create <a href="http://p8tch.com/">your own patches</a>. Instead of bumping on your iPhone, why not scan someone&#8217;s QR code to learn more about them? Hosting a charity event? Raise funds on location with QR coding.</li>
<li><strong>Geography based tours and reviews</strong> &#8211; City Search and Antenna Audio launched a <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/03/26/BU1LVQQOB.DTL#ixzz0eIqgSTnT">test run</a> of geography based QR coding in the spring of 2008. QR codes were distributed around San Francisco in restaurants and at popular destinations. The codes included restaurant reviews, as well as audio tours and historical facts allowing tourists access to distinct decision making information.</li>
<li><strong>Loyalty points system</strong> &#8211; In Japan, <a href="http://www.coca-cola.com/">Coca Cola</a> uses QR codes to reward loyal customers. Vending machines have QR codes imprinted on them, and consumers are invited to earn as many as they can, ultimately redeeming them to get prizes.</li>
<li><strong>Secrets and acts of defiance</strong> &#8211; <a href="http://www.petshopboys.co.uk/">The Pet Shop Boys</a> <http://www.petshopboys.co.uk/> released a single in 2007 on which they denounced the idea of a British national identity card. On the CD cover, there was a QR code that directed to their attack on the system. Also, the entire music video sports different QR codes that link to civil liberties websites. Pretty cool that QR coding is being used to spawn political debate and protesting!</li>
<li><strong>Alternative paintballing</strong> &#8211; No more immediate bruising from the paintballs flying at you at speeds approximately 60mph (at least that&#8217;s what it feels like). Players wear t-shirts with their own individualized QR code. A player snaps your QR code from afar and a text message is sent to you informing you of your demise, allowing for a high quality game sans the pain!</li>
<li><strong>Intelligent advertising</strong> &#8211; changing the site location to match the weather. Dynamic QR codes are special codes can be updated in real time for businesses that sell products that might potentially have a need to change advertising in response to say, the weather. What if Gap had a billboard in the NYC subway station and the QR code directed the consumer to the GAP mobile homepage featuring a new line of flip-flops? Well, on Tuesday New York has a forecast of heavy rain. No, problem. Just switch out that QR code to direct consumers to the part of the website that highlights Gap&#8217;s new swanky umbrellas!</li>
<li><strong>A great idea</strong> by DDB Brazil for Editoras Online &#8211; DDB Brazil in a campaign for Online, a Brazilian online bookstore, incorporated almost every valuable player in the media arena. QR codes are the single piece that molded the dynamic parts of the campaign together. This <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PG4thXVM2qk">YouTube video</a> explains the intricacies of the campaign far better than I could here. By far my favorite in terms of innovation and success! 33 Interactions has a great post by Jenine Wong that gives an <a href="http://33interactions.com.au/33blog/communications/qr-code-qriosity-ideas-to-demonstrate-their-potential-part-2">extensive description</a> of the campaign as well.</li>
<li>Tim Burton&#8217;s film &#8220;9&#8243; used QR codes that allowed fans to view sneak peaks and hear commentary from the director.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.greenday.com/">Green Day</a>&#8216;s album, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/21st_Century_Breakdown">21st Century Breakdown</a> featured QR codes in posters, promo items, and ads directing you to a site with exclusive downloads and images of the band.</li>
<li>L.A. Candy, the newest book by Lauren Conrad sports a QR code on the <a href="http://2d-code.co.uk/harpercollins-qr-codes/">back cover</a>.</li>
</ul>
<p>So, will QR codes be the &#8220;<a href="http://adage.com/digitalnext/article?article_id=138154">URL Killer</a>&#8220;, as Garrick Schmitt and others have described it? In his article Schmitt says, &#8220;QR codes will become the primary bridge connecting real and virtual worlds.&#8221; As you can see from the aforementioned examples, these codes are one step in the direction of the inevitable merging and graying of media. One builds on the other builds on the next. The mobile revolution and the saturation of the online space have created a need for simpler URLs and innovative connections. And of course, as I mentioned in one of my previous blog entries, <a href="http://blog.redmccombsmedia.com/2009/09/mobile-marketing-prowess/">Mobile Marketing Prowess</a>, the mobile consumer wants conversation. QR codes have opened the door to a broader and deeper range of personal targeting and communication, and they have the potential to become a value exchange of relevant, individualized, useful, and interesting information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.rmmonline.com/2010/02/are-you-qrious/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEO Will Not Die in 2010</title>
		<link>http://blog.rmmonline.com/2010/01/seo-will-not-die-in-2010/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=seo-will-not-die-in-2010</link>
		<comments>http://blog.rmmonline.com/2010/01/seo-will-not-die-in-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 17:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.redmccombsmedia.com/?p=242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over the past couple of months there has been quite a bit of banter on the web about whether or not search engine optimization (SEO) will finally fall on its face in 2010. This has been a perennial argument for at least the past ten years, maybe longer. After all, Google keeps updating its algorithm [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the past couple of months there has been quite a bit of banter on the web about whether or not search engine optimization (SEO) will finally fall on its face in 2010. This has been a perennial argument for at least the past ten years, maybe longer. After all, Google keeps updating its algorithm to avoid being gamed, right? This has been further accelerated in recent months by the addition of <a href="http://www.google.com/support/websearch/bin/answer.py?hl=en&#038;answer=106230">Google Suggest</a>, <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/12/personalized-search-for-everyone.html">personalized search</a>, <a href="http://googlemobile.blogspot.com/2010/01/finding-places-near-me-now-is-easier.html">localized search</a>, <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/12/relevance-meets-real-time-web.html">real-time search</a> and finally, the search giant providing answers to questions within its own site (for example, <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=dallas+cowboys">sports scores</a>, <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=seattle+weather">weather</a>, <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=43202+movie+showtimes">movie showtimes</a>, and I&#8217;m sure there are others). If Google is changing things to make this more difficult, then what&#8217;s the value of this service?</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t be fooled. Yes, the snake oil hucksters that schlep keyword stuffing and link spamming are doomed, but their future was never very bright to begin with. If this is your strategy you&#8217;ll get nowhere, and if you&#8217;re paying for this then you&#8217;re wasting your money. If you&#8217;re charging someone for this, shame on you.</p>
<p>The core aspects of SEO, however, are needed more than ever. Google alone averages <a href="http://searchenginewatch.com/3630718">more than 200 million searches per day</a>. With that much daily traffic, their view of your website matters. Do you really want to completely ignore the potential to earn traffic from them? Or worse, leave it entirely to chance? If you get one ten-thousandth of one percent of that (that&#8217;s 0.0001%), 200 people per day will see your site. Do that many people cross your doorstep each day? Does your phone ring that many times each day? Clearly there is an upside to paying attention to Google.</p>
<p>The traffic that your website receives can provide keen insight into what your target market thinks about your company. Whatever the goals of your company, your website can help you get there. Increasing sales, improving customer retention, reaching a new customer base, improving the return that you get on your AdWords spend&#8230; these are all achievable. As long as you are measuring your website&#8217;s traffic and can recognize trends, you can reach your goals.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t misread the data. Yes search is changing, it has been since it started. It would be a mistake to infer that this makes SEO irrelevant. Quite the contrary, the changes that Google is making strengthen their search results, which gives people greater confidence in the answers they find through Google, which means that more people will be searching.</p>
<p>Optimizing your website for search is more important now than ever. Frankly, it&#8217;s irresponsible to think otherwise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.rmmonline.com/2010/01/seo-will-not-die-in-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mobile Marketing Prowess</title>
		<link>http://blog.rmmonline.com/2009/09/mobile-marketing-prowess/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=mobile-marketing-prowess</link>
		<comments>http://blog.rmmonline.com/2009/09/mobile-marketing-prowess/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 21:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ann Marie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.redmccombsmedia.com/?p=205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, I am about to take the plunge into the world of smartphones. These hands were made to T9, but my thumbs are getting sore. After weeks of debating I have come to the conclusion that, to me, it is worth it. Worth the extra money I will have to fork over to partake in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I am about to take the plunge into the world of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smartphone">smartphones</a>. These hands were made to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T9_%28predictive_text%29">T9</a>, but my thumbs are getting sore. After weeks of debating I have come to the conclusion that, to me, it is worth it. Worth the extra money I will have to fork over to partake in this new subculture.</p>
<p>Smartphone mobile marketing. I am pretty surprised at how many my age have a smartphone, considering most are not OTP (off-the-payroll)&#8230; Anyways, welcome to my generation. A generation of late 80&#8242;s children who have gone from email to AIM to text messaging to video messaging to sending videos and pictures via phone, and managed to become the forerunners of each. We have grown up embracing change in the form of communication. I remember as a kid in elementary school emailing friends in real time. We would sit at our computers and wait for each other&#8217;s response.</p>
<p>ME: &#8220;Hey wasuppp?&#8221;<br />
BFF: &#8220;Nothing much u?&#8221;</p>
<p>These were emails we sent. If there was no response, we came back later and tried again. It was instant messaging, before instant messaging! The movie <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0088763/">Back to the Future</a> was right. Only it predicted advancement in a different field. We have mastered communication. </p>
<p>Back to mobile. Why I chose a smartphone? It is all-in-one. No more carrying around a phone, a GPS device, an mp3/ipod player, a watch, a planner, etc. All is there. In hand, organized, and instantaneous.</p>
<p>For marketers I see the main smart phone mobile marketing problem as one of &#8220;personal prowess.&#8221; How does the product/service become personal to the consumer, and how do we make sure they experience this relationship? This is THE question. </p>
<p><strong>A 360-degree Campaign</strong><br />
The message needs to be frequent and relative to the target audience. Right? However, I believe that we should go beyond that and involve more channels of communication, as many as we can to ensure a broader reach. A 360-degree campaign. This means carrying your message across all platforms that hit the target audience. Hyper-focusing on one area does not ensure success, in fact it limits the whole campaign. Smartphones are just one part of the bigger media picture, but they have increased ten-fold the opportunities for cross promotional advertising. Interaction is the name of the game. A restaurant billboard that sends a map of its nearest location to your phone, an in-store display that offers discounts to users who text-in, etc.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s good to note that going too broad, in regards to channels of communication, could hurt you. Therefore, breadth and depth need to be considered. We involve as many channels as we need to ensure maximum reach potential, but not so many that we are unable to create deep relationships with the consumers. Therefore, a successful 360-degree campaign will further an effective and quality-filled message via the right networks to open two-way communication between the client and target consumer.</p>
<p><strong>It&#8217;s a Two-Way Street</strong><br />
EMarketer points out in its latest report <a href="http://www.emarketer.com/Reports/All/Emarketer_2000589.aspx">Mobile Users and Usage: It&#8217;s Personal</a> that, </p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;As mobile subscribers and the devices they use grow in sophistication, mobile will develop into a ubiquitous platform for messaging, social networking, entertainment and Web access. In turn, growing sophistication in users, devices and usage patterns will mean increased opportunities for marketers to connect with consumers, particularly among the growing population of smartphone users.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yet marketers must take seriously the highly personal relationship users have with their mobile devices, and respect the need for a <strong>value exchange</strong>. Expecting something for nothing is not an option.&#8221;</p>
<p>I love that line, &#8220;&#8230;expecting something for nothing is not an option.&#8221; This is no longer a push-it-in-your-face-and-hope-you-buy-it world. Smart phones mandated a new law; Listen and respond, or be talked about. Not an easy feat. </p>
<p><strong>Can we talk about this for a minute?</strong><br />
With all of that said, I believe that the innate and initial appeal of a product or service, in regards to the smart phone user, is the <strong>brand&#8217;s personality and openness to communication</strong>. It puts the product or service on the radar of these consumers. Without this elusive foundation, the potential dialogue could be lost. (This cannot be measured by metrics and is one of the great psychological and mysterious parts of advertising that I love.) </p>
<p>So, at the heart of the smart phone is; conversation. The smart phone mobile consumer is the communication forerunner. The phone they carry is ultimately their main line of contact and an extension of themselves, and they want a reason to keep a personal vested interest in your brand.</p>
<p>Tap into this notion and the world of smart phone users is your digital oyster. &#8220;It&#8217;s a small world after all&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.rmmonline.com/2009/09/mobile-marketing-prowess/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

