<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook Won&#8217;t Kill Search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.rmmonline.com/2010/07/facebook-wont-kill-search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.rmmonline.com/2010/07/facebook-wont-kill-search/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=facebook-wont-kill-search</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 22:03:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://blog.rmmonline.com/2010/07/facebook-wont-kill-search/comment-page-1/#comment-2448</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 00:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.redmccombsmedia.com/?p=332#comment-2448</guid>
		<description>I wholeheartedly agree. However popular Facebook becomes for search, the types of searches are entirely different. Google is the leader because they have become an excellent source of information on any topic. Car tires, podcasts, software, movie showtimes, Korean food... everything. Facebook is only good for finding people. Even if they were to try to begin providing answers (which is a big if), convincing people to use them for search just isn&#039;t going to happen. As you point out, users already have a healthy dose of skepticism for Zuckerberg &amp; co, they&#039;ll never seriously compete with Google.

Besides, Zuckerberg has bigger fish to fry. Right now he&#039;s focused on keeping Facebook. Turns out that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.businessinsider.com/facebook-contract-mark-zuckerberg-2010-7&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Paul Ceglia has a legitimate shot&lt;/a&gt; of gaining the lion&#039;s share of Facebook.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wholeheartedly agree. However popular Facebook becomes for search, the types of searches are entirely different. Google is the leader because they have become an excellent source of information on any topic. Car tires, podcasts, software, movie showtimes, Korean food&#8230; everything. Facebook is only good for finding people. Even if they were to try to begin providing answers (which is a big if), convincing people to use them for search just isn&#8217;t going to happen. As you point out, users already have a healthy dose of skepticism for Zuckerberg &#038; co, they&#8217;ll never seriously compete with Google.</p>
<p>Besides, Zuckerberg has bigger fish to fry. Right now he&#8217;s focused on keeping Facebook. Turns out that <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/facebook-contract-mark-zuckerberg-2010-7" rel="nofollow">Paul Ceglia has a legitimate shot</a> of gaining the lion&#8217;s share of Facebook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Red McCombs Media Blog » Facebook Won’t Kill Search -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://blog.rmmonline.com/2010/07/facebook-wont-kill-search/comment-page-1/#comment-2427</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Red McCombs Media Blog » Facebook Won’t Kill Search -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 00:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.redmccombsmedia.com/?p=332#comment-2427</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Chris Leonard and Chris Leonard, RMM Online. RMM Online said: Blogging: Facebook won&#039;t kill search. http://bit.ly/a1q781 Not even close. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Chris Leonard and Chris Leonard, RMM Online. RMM Online said: Blogging: Facebook won&#39;t kill search. <a href="http://bit.ly/a1q781" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/a1q781</a> Not even close. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

